Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Throw a Wrench in It!

Everything in my life happens in themes.  I have learned over the years to simply step aside and see what themes emerge.  Although I've received training in a number of therapeutic orientations - including psychodynamic, behavioral, and humanistic - I can't help but conceptualize what my clients are telling me as themes or threads that run like an undercurrent through their lives. It's how I roll.

The most current theme present in my life is that of homeostasis.  Big snooze, right?  But if you can look past the name, homeostasis, (assuming you're not also getting off (like I am!) on the feel of the word airily flowing across your palate, the idea of homeostasis can be applied anywhere and everywhere that you're...

Stuck!

So, my boyfriend is going through some major changes in his life right now (FYI, I receive no permission from Boyfriend or family members to use them as examples of dysfunction; they're all potential "material").  He and I are actually experiencing major synchronicity as we both attempt to find new ways of "being" in new business ventures - and in the world of social media.  If it's even possible for one to be newer to social media than I, he's been on Twitter for about 2 seconds, compared to the 5 seconds I've been on so I, once again, give myself permission to observe and comment.

For those of you who have followed this blog until now, you know that I've struggled (and continue to struggle) with how to communicate my identity to my "peeps" Over the past month and through a lot of difficult work on my personal growth in order to free myself up for a new way of doing business, I have come face-to-face with moments of struggle where I catch myself doing business-as-usual and giving in to the gravity-like pull of homeostasis. 

Boyfriend has been struggling with a particular form of homeostasis, of which I, too, am guilty:

Business As Competition (BAC), as in ass-BACkwards. 

We all want to win.  What we're "winning" I have not a clue.  But we want to win nonetheless.  We've been socialized to think this is a natural way to relate, communicate, run businesses.  

Here's a snippet of this morning's conversation with Boyfriend after he asked me (ME!) some Twitter advice about whether or not he should "follow" someone who does the same line of work as he does:

ME:  You should follow him.  He's in the same industry, and he'll most likely follow you back cause he has a good follower ratio.  (please don't judge me...)

BOYFRIEND:  But he's my COMPETITION, and he has a similar product, and we'll be selling to the same market.

ME:  So you'll both be working together to educate the market, and some people will want your product and some people might want his product, but together you'll be increasing the number of total people interested in the product - and that's a good thing!

And then it hit me.  It's that thing again.  The thing that keeps Boyfriend, me, my clients, my kids, families, friends, businesses, society... STUCK is nothing other than fear of not having enough.  There's not enough money, clients, love, affection, attention, time.  Fill in your own blank.

We see the world as a finite vessel with a finite amount of things we want and need.  We operate from a place of scarcity instead of abundance.  And it's gonna take a big wrench (or a lot of small wrenches working together) to throw a wrench in the proverbial machine and break free from fear of scarcity and lack.

Henceforth, I will choose to see abundance, and I am going to align myself only with those who also make this choice...

Many of us think of homeostasis as balance, equilibrium, stability, constancy... but I'm referring to the homeostasis of business-as-usual, status-quo, stagnation, paralysis.  When my psychologist hat is on, the people I'm working with need me to see their homeostasis, point it out to them, and throw a wrench in it.

In essence, I am a homeostasis wrecker.

But the thing with homeostasis is, even when the old way of doing things is screwing everything up, its pull is so insidious, that a wrench thrown in on anything less than a consistent basis is simply not enough to cause a lasting, real change.  We must consistently and constantly call-out that place in ourselves where the fear lives - and make a conscious choice to change... over and over again.

A lasting change comes from work that lasts a lifetime.

And as I go through this process of defining, developing, and refining my online identity, I'm really liking the "Real Me" I'm getting in touch with.

So, I must leave you now to go happily "follow" a bunch of people who do exactly what I do, so that we can strengthen our collective message and throw our wrenches into the world.

Bye for now.

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://kadierants.blogspot.com/2011/02/stasis-v-homeostasis-and-human.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hear you, or should I say, I read you! But perhaps our differences are more semantic than philosophical.

    I'm using Systems Theory's definition of homeostasis in which all forces are keeping people stuck in dysfunctional personal, relationship, and family patterns (triangulation, scapegoating, coalitions), where a change in the system (e.g., therapy) brings about stronger forces in the system that then fight the "change."

    So the problem is not stasis at all, but the force that occurs to keep things the same when the idea is to change.. which is homeostasis.

    Take, for example, the person who wants to lose weight and is going on a diet. It's usually unconscious but, although family members SAY they support the person in changing dysfunctional behaviors, they are actually working against the person being successful. This pattern is what prompted separate family support systems in 12-step programs: so that the family members are clear about patterns that serve to enable dysfunctional behaviors and patterns. Lubing up at this point will only serve to keep interactions exactly as they are...

    I stick to my Phillips metaphor instead of your proposed KY one... but always game for intellectual sparring...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Marla, I love the steps you are taking. I am a recovering Clinical Psychologist and after several entrepreneurial adventures I have found my dream job which is helping small business people build their online presences and teaching them how to use their WordPress websites as the hub of their Social Media Marketing. I love it since it combines my psychology skills, technology background and design ability.

    My business name is New Tricks and I believe it is never too late to learn new tricks to change and to grow a business.

    I applaud you for jumping into this wonderful arena and will be following your progress!

    ReplyDelete
  5. IN RE PHILLIPS:

    Even in Family Systems Theory (Which tends to fail in taking into account the super system), families tend to strive for homeostasis. It is when dysfunctional forces impact that homeostasis that we se pathologies emerge. The examples that you cite of triangulation, scapegoating, & coalitions are not examples of homeostasis producing actions, but rather actions that are by their definition directional and impair the dynamic balance and required feedback loops of the family system. Now… I cannot argue that the forces do not keep one stuck, as they certainly do; However this is not homeostasis, rather stagnation or stasis as in these examples there is obviously no dynamic balance. Chiefly evident as the need for therapy arose. This is akin to having to take your car to the mechanic because it overheated on the highway. The mechanic may notice that they used the wrong oil (inserted free plug here :-) )

    Cognitive Homeostasis is not a lack of ideas and is not a mental constancy, rather a balance of ideas, thoughts and influences which allows one to optimally weigh data, and interact with the world in a manner free from abrasive intrapsychic issues (psychasthenia). These phenomenon create extreme directionality of expression as either a ‘stasis/stagnation’ which we then see clinically as inwardly driven disorders such as Depression, Anxiety, OCD, etc. or an ‘extreme external motility’ such as interpersonally exploitative / vindictive behaviors. Again, it is the lack of homeostasis, not the maintenance of it that is responsible for this problem.

    In the example of the family working against the weight loss person… I would once again argue, that the mere action of ‘working against’ is in and of itself non-homeostatic. Rather, this is a symmetrical interaction that in any system will give rise to resistance and decompensation of the system limits in the same way that an aneurysm will breach an arterial wall.

    Lube and a Kick is what we need :-)

    ReplyDelete